Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Sylvia Thompson, on Obama

Excellent article by black conservative, Sylvia Thompson.  She tells it like it is - Obama wants to destroy America and what it stands for and that has and always will be his goal. While he's at it, destroying Israel also would be frosting on his cake.

Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.
Ms. Thompson is a copy editor by trade currently residing in Tennessee. She formerly wrote for the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley California Newsletter and the online conservative blog ChronWatch, also out of California.
She grew up in Southeast Texas during the waning years of Jim Crow-era legalized segregation, and she concludes that race relations in America will never improve, nor will we ever elevate our culture, as long as there are victims to be pandered to and villains to be vilified. America is better served without victims or villains.

Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy"

Sylvia Thompson
Sylvia ThompsonOctober 26, 2015
To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.
The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.
I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.
Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.
 This is my take.
Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.
 Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.
Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.

Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.
 Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.
Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.

It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.
 These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."
The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.
 Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.
Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.

© Copyright 2015 by Sylvia Thompson

Sunday, November 15, 2015


Hurray for the mayor of Dorval, a suburb of Montreal.  Political correctness is not part of his plan.  I wish more Americans would assert themselves this way instead of bending over backwards to accommodate the Muslim immigrants - this is our country and they are the visitors and they need to adjust to our rules and not expect us to change the way we live to accommodate them .... and if they don't like that - go to a Muslim country!!!!

Let's  hear it for a Quebec mayor...
A commercial promoting pork says:  "PUT SOME PORK ON YOUR
Muslim parents demanded the abolition of pork in all the school canteens of a
Montreal suburb.
The mayor of the Montreal suburb of Dorval has refused, and the town clerk
sent a note to all parents to explain why.
"Muslims must understand that they have to adapt to Canada and Quebec , its
customs, its traditions, and its way of life, because that's where they
chose to immigrate.
"Muslims must understand that they have to integrate and learn to live in Quebec.
"They must understand that it is for them to change their lifestyle, not
the Canadians who, so generously, welcomed them.
"Muslims must understand that Canadians are neither racist nor xenophobic. Canada
accepted many immigrants before Muslims showed up (whereas the reverse is
not true in that Muslim states do not accept non-Muslim immigrants)."
"Just like other nations, Canadians are not willing to give up their identity or
their culture.
"And, if Canada is a land of welcome, it's not the Mayor of Dorval who welcomes
foreigners, but the Canadian-Quebecois people as a whole.
"Finally, they must understand that in Canada ( Quebec ) with its Judeo-Christian
roots, Christmas trees, churches and religious festivals, religion must
remain in the private domain."
The municipality of Dorval was right to refuse any concessions to Islam and
"For Muslims who disagree with secularism and do not feel comfortable in Canada,
there are 57 beautiful Muslim countries in the world, most of them
under-populated and ready to receive them with open halal arms in
accordance with Sharia.
"If you left your country for Canada , and not for other Muslim countries, it
is because you have considered that life is better in Canada than
elsewhere. We will not let you drag Canada down to the level of those 57
"Ask yourself this question - just once: "Why is it better here in Canada than
where you come from?"
"A  canteen with pork on the menu is part of the answer."
If you came to Canada with the idea that you will displace us with your
prolific propagation and eventually take over the country, you should pack
up and go back to the country you came from.  We have no room here
for you and your ideology.
If you feel the same, forward it on.  If not, hit the delete, and
prepare to be displaced.

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Required Reading from a Sixty Nine Year Old

This gentleman says what I think - I guess that I'm tired too!!!!!!!! Please spread this around, it needs to be read everywhere.....

69 and Tired
This was written by a member of the Massachusetts Senate, the cradle of American liberty who after a number of years in his post and reaching the age of 69, wrote this document.
This should be required reading for every man, woman, and
child in the United St
ates, Canada, the UK, Australia, and
New Zealand.

69 and I'm Tired
By Robert A. Hall
I'm 69. Except for one semester in college when jobs were scarce
and a six-month period when I was between jobs, but job-hunting
every day, I've worked, hard, since I was 18. Despite some health
challenges, I still put in
  40-hour weeks, and haven't called in sick
in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn't inherit my
job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. I'm tired. Very
I'm tired of being told that I have to "spread the wealth" to people
who don't have my work ethic. I'm tired of being told the government
will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to
people too lazy to earn it.
I'm tired of being told that Islam is a "Religion of Peace," when every
day I can read dozens of stories of Muslim men killing their sisters,
wives and daughters for their family "Honor"; of Muslims rioting
over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews
because they aren't "believers"; of Muslims burning schools for girls;
of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for "adultery"; of
Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls; all in the name of Allah,
because the Qur'an and Shara law tells them to.
I'm tired of being told that out of "tolerance for other cultures" we
must let Saudi Arabia use our oil money to fund mosques and
mandrassa Islamic schools to preach hate in America and Canada, while
no American nor Canadian group is allowed to fund a church, synagogue
or religious school in Saudi Arabia to teach love and tolerance.
I'm tired of being told I must lower my living standard to fight
global warming, which no one is allowed to debate.
I'm tired of being told that drug addicts have a disease, and I must help
support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a giant germ
rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their noses
while they tried to fight it off?
I'm tired of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers, and politicians of both
parties talking about innocent mistakes, stupid mistakes, or youthful
mistakes, when we all know they think their only mistake was getting caught.
I'm tired of people with a sense of entitlement, rich or poor.
I'm real tired of people who don't take responsibility for their lives and
actions. I'm tired of hearing them blame the government, or discrimination
or big-whatever for their problems.
Yes, I'm damn tired. But I'm also glad to be 69  . Because, mostly, I'm not
going to have to see the world these people are making. 
 I'm just really sorry
for my grandchildren.
Robert A. Hall is a Marine Vietnam veteran who served five terms
in the Massachusetts State Senate.
There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!
This is your chance to make a difference.
I'm 69 and I'm tired.
If you don't forward this you are part of the problem.

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Why Hillary Destroyed those Emails

Interesting email that I received today - no wonder Hillary destroyed those emails, they should put her in jail, although I doubt that would happen to HER!!!! This truly is money laundering on a very grand scale and the American taxpayer is supporting it.

 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing it.

Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.

This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it works:

1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.

2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold  millions to a  Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the  Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually all tax free,    which means you and I are subsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:

Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.

Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000  e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.

Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they are Slick!   Warning:  They could be back in the White House in January 2017.  Don't let it happen.  Remember, most people are not well informed.  You must inform and educate them.